| Page 2 Let me tell you, if IRS is going to destroy people, as they destroyed me, then they sure as shooting should not have errors in their accounts. Don't you agree? If I am charged these crippling penalties for what IRS perceives as my failures in my responsibility to it, what should it be charged for its failures in its responsibility to me? Let me tell you, an apology for destroying my business, my health, my well being, my belief in my country, is not enough. It is in fact, an insult. IRS's apology is a pretense that what IRS did was not really serious, when the fact is that what IRS did, and does to many, many people, is serious. It is so serious, that I do not want to continue to live like this, and I will not. When my property is foreclosed or I run out of money, whichever comes first, I will kill myself. I know how I will do it, and I am satisfied that my death will be preferable to this kind of life, dominated by an unjust, negligent, irresponsible, malignant, vengeful, and tawdry IRS. Tawdry? Yes, IRS has neither integrity nor good in it, nor value, to outweigh its evils. At the moment I have $90 and a Motion for Summary Judgement in the foreclosure proceedings, to which Motion I have replied. In terms of the "many, many people" to whom IRS does what it has done to me, how many of the 2.9 million people levied by IRS in 1994, could make and substantiate the same claims of injustice against IRS that I am making. Half? More than half? One final question about IRS's accounting: why are IRS's Net sheets "creative" with their numbers, showing interest and penalties being assessed earlier than they were assessed in real life? Is this kind of accounting acceptable in business? If it is, then is it acceptable for me to send back Nets from my point of view: showing all my payments under the earliest date? and giving the impression that I should be sent back all penalties and interest that I was charged. Accounting like that employed, for example, in IRS's 1990 Net is deceptive, and should not be acceptable from the IRS. Yes, I am angry. Look at 1985: zeroed out 2/9/87, reactivated 3/29/93. All because IRS lost my 1984 return? Judging by IRS's 4/4/86 entry in my 1984 account, "Payment with return 23.94," they had received it. Yes, I was late, I'm sorry about that. But should I have been levied in 1991, penalized over $7000, and in the end put out of business? No. This is not simply a matter of a lost return. "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," I don't think so. What IRS is doing is a horror, there is no other name for it, and there is no excuse for it. Plus, your failure, Mr. Rubin, to answer any of my letters (12/7/96, 6/8/96,7/1/96, 7/10/96, 8/5/96, or 8/15/96) indicates that you accept what IRS does and indeed underwrite it. I understand that you are Secretary of the Treasury and an important person; I have gained a little better understanding of you from sketches provided in Johnson's, The System, but none of that changes the fact that I believe my life is important enough for you to pay attention to the fact that IRS has destroyed what I need to live. Let me tell you, I like President Clinton, but I hate what you, the Treasury and IRS, are doing to people. Unless you take it upon yourself to stop this, you may very well find your job lost, because people are listening to Kemp. Watch the news, listen to the applause for, "Get rid of IRS!" Sincerely, Karen Kline Karen Kline Enclosure: copy of a letter that amplifies ideas in this letter. I am excising the name and address so that IRS cannot take action against my friend the way it often takes action against people who disagree with it. Plus copies of appropriate IRS accounts, each exhibiting some of what I am saying. Page 1 (Preceding Page) Tax Accounts complained of -- (pages 4 to 7 of Bound Letters) |
| . |
http://www.health-boundaries-bite.com/Fingernails.html
Learn some warning signs --
|