Action for Justice, Pro Se

5/25/04 I just received the order,
so I'm adding the lawyer's last
email, to which I haven't yet
responded. These are in typical
email reverse order, with the
most recently received on the top.

After them will be the Order and
Judgement.

5/21/04
I find it interesting that the
decision was, according to the
judges' lawyer, done on the 19th,
but I haven't received it yet...

And, the judge's secretary, or her
assistant, but anyway, someone
named Barbara at the judge's
number, told me this morning
that a copy to me was going out
today...

5/25/04
I did file the IRS case using the
Taxable Income material from
that fellow in Pennsylvania
whose name I forget.

I did file the Nichols case.

The St. Vincent case I did not
file with that court, I filed it in
state court and the US attorney
removed it to US Court.It was
not a federally funded clinic,
except in a few things, like a pap
smear I got... so that was a bit
fraudulent.

The Santa Fe case was also
removed from state court.
Because I was given an
opportunity to amend in it, based
on the fact that amendment is
favored, I trusted I would be able
to amend in this case, also.

But as far as I can tell, the Order
doesn't even mention my several
requests in my Objection to
Motion, to amend.

6/18/05
To clarify, the lawyer was able to
email me about the Order way
before I received it because he
would have received it nearly
instantly by electronic transfer.